LONDON, Aug 13: An Australia batsman with a technique that departs from the coaching manual piling on the runs in the Ashes – England have been here before.
But should Steve Smith be compared to the greatest of them all, Don Bradman? The pair have been mentioned repeatedly in the same breath since Smith hit innings of 144 and 142 during Australia’s 251-run win over England in the first Test at Edgbaston, a triumphant return to Test cricket following a 12-month ban for his role in a ball-tampering scandal.
Yet amid cricket’s welter of statistics, one figure stands alone – Bradman’s Test batting average of 99.94.
Taking 20 innings as the minimum qualification, Smith is currently second to Bradman with 62.96.
No one either before and certainly not in the 70 years since Bradman played his last Test in 1948 has come close to that mark of nearly a 100 runs per innings in the format.
Whereas Smith missed a year of Australia cricket duty at the height of his career, Bradman missed several, not for breaking the rules but because of the interruption to international sport caused by World War II.
In his first Test back in 1946, Bradman made 187 against England in Brisbane and followed up with 234 in Sydney.
Yet by scoring two hundreds in an Ashes Test, the 30-year old Smith managed a feat that proved beyond ‘The Don’.
Some observers deprecated Bradman’s fondness for the pull, while a stance that saw him pick up his bat from a position between his feet rather than behind the back foot was certainly unorthodox.
These, however, seem like minor ‘imperfections’ compared to the way in which the fidgety Smith – who has his laces taped to his boots as he does not like to see them – shuffles across his crease before each ball he faces.
Such an approach ought to make Smith a prime candidate for lbw yet he has scored five centuries in his past six Ashes Tests, averaging 139. But there is method in all of this. As Smith explained two years ago, he used to take guard on middle stump and not have a ‘trigger’ foot movement. – AFP